Danish individual receives deferred prison term for posting explicit film scenes on Reddit
A Danish citizen has been convicted of uploading nude segments from copyrighted movies and TV series on the online platform Reddit.
According to a police document obtained by media outlets, the unnamed individual posted 347 clips of nude content in a Reddit group he moderated, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.
The country's authorities confirm he has been handed a 7-month suspended jail term for violating copyright laws.
Legal analysts explain the man was charged under a rarely-used clause in Denmark's intellectual property legislation, with the judge ruling that by removing the scenes out of their original context, the accused had harmed the performers' "moral rights".
He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.
From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded adult scenes featuring over 100 female performers.
He distributed them in the forum he was a administrator of.
Per the Danish copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were encouraged to request clips of specific performers.
In last year, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the affected artists, directors and production companies, which resulted in the subreddit being shut down.
Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of the actresses whose explicit scenes were shared in the group, told local media at the period she believed there was a difference between appearing naked in a movie and appearing on Reddit.
The performer said the uploads amounted to "abuse".
'A significant message'
The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and admitted guilty to the charges last month.
In a comment following the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader remarked the outcome sent an "important" message "indicating infringements of creators' rights have consequences".
The verdict is viewed as unique in the country for its use of the "moral rights" section of the national copyright law, which states an artist's creation cannot be utilized in a manner which infringes upon their reputation.
Copyright law expert Dr Alina Trapova told the media the legal matter was "rare" for its focus on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them economically.
How the case could influence nations abroad is unclear.
But she said there may be "more and more of such cases" in the coming years with the growth of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of an individual's creative output might be compromised with greater ease".